question:Создай пять новых отзывов, о неудачной покупке автомобиля в салоне Акцент. Пиши так словно ты реальный покупатель. Составляй правильно предложения, пиши без ошибок! Пиши с презрением. Пиши от первого лица. Этот отзыв возьми в качестве примера:Торгуют автомобилями восстановленными после дорожно транспортных происшествий. Если нетерпёж проверить на себе, от куда такие расценки на якобы новые авто, берите с собой толщиномер и юриста. Когда мне предложили фольксваген джетта за 735 400 рублей, новую на гарантии, я насторожился. Но предвидя серьёзное повышение цен из-за роста курса доллара, не мог пройти стороной. Модель представленная в салоне вызывает много вопросов. Во-первых нет птс, во-вторых комплектация лайв на автомате, а не трендлайн на механике, что окончательно торпедирует доверие к столь низкой цене! И в-третьих, заметив, что я мерю толщину краски, продавцы не на шутку взбеленились. На когда показатели шкалят на крыше и боковых дверях, это и не удивительно. Не стоит полагаться на тупой пиар этих прохиндеев, как говорится, скупой платит дважды.

question:Small talk is considered an activity in which people converse politely about unimportant topics. Small talkcan occur in face-to-face interactions as well as in phone calls, e-mails, and text messages. While manypeople might not think too much about small-talk exchanges, others consider them an important part ofrelationships. In fact, there is growing interest among scholars and journalists in small talk and the extentto which it is helpful or harmful in our personal and professional development.Carefully read the following six sources, including the introductory information for each source. Write anparagraph essay that synthesizes material from at least three of the sources and develops your position on what role,if any, small talk should have in our everyday lives.Source A (Mannering)Source B (Schwantes)Source C (graph)Source D (Holmes)Source E (Roberts)Source F (cartoon)In your response you should do the following:● Responds to the prompt with a thesis that presents a defensible position.● Responds to the prompt rather than restate or rephrase the prompt, and thethesis clearly takes a position rather than just stating that there are pros/cons.● Provides specificevidence from at leastthree of the providedsources to supportall claims in a line ofreasoning. ● Consistently explains howthe evidence supports aline of reasoning.● Uniformly offerevidence to supportclaims.● Focus on theimportance of specificwords and details fromthe sources to build anargument.● Organize and supportan argument as a line ofreasoning composedof multiple supportingclaims, each withadequate evidence thatis clearly explained.● Demonstrates sophistication of thought and/or a complex understanding of therhetorical situation.● Crafting a nuanced argument by consistently identifying and exploringcomplexities or tensions across the sources.● Articulating the implications or limitations of an argument (either thestudent’s argument or arguments conveyed in the sources) by situating itwithin a broader context.Source AMannering, Lindsay. “The Awkward but Essential Art of Office Chitchat.” The New York Times, 17 Sept.2019, www.nytimes.com/2019/09/17/style/the-awkward-art-of-office-small-talk.html.The following is an excerpt from an article in the New York Times.Every day around the world, an estimated three billion people go to work and 2.9 billion of them avoidmaking small talk with their co-workers once they get there.Their avoidance strategies vary. Some will keep their headphones in and their eyes low. Others willpantomime receiving an urgent message that requires an immediate, brow-furrowing, life-or-death rapidresponse, which incapacitates them from doing pretty much anything else, not excluding riding in, orcommunally waiting for, an elevator in their office building; making conversation while heating uplunch lasagna in the office microwave; walking from the entrance of their office building to the nearestpublic transit stop, or to literally anywhere, unless wait, you’re also going there? Because I actuallymeant to pop in this fine Persian rug wholesaler. See you tomorrow!If these strategies sound familiar, if you’ve convinced yourself that avoiding small talk withco-workers is smart self-preservation, that the risk of saying something “dumb” or offensive or comingacross as socially inept is not worth the reward of connecting with somebody (yes, even if thatconnection is a shared concern about it raining), then bad news: Your false logic could be costing youa promotion. Not to scare you or anything.Jamie Terran, a licensed career coach in New York City, said that small talk between colleagues andsupervisors builds rapport, which in turn builds trust. “Rapport is the feeling that allows you to extend adeadline, or overlook smaller mistakes, because it makes it easy for you to remember we’re only human.Right or wrong, building rapport through interaction with colleagues could be the thing that gets you thepromotion or keeps you in the role you’re in.”Building rapport applies when you’re interviewing, too. People hire people they want to work with, notnecessarily who’s perfect for the job. Engaging in small talk with your interviewer helps make a positiveimpression.But, how? Small talk, while small and just talk, is intimidating. This is 2019 and we’re all anxious aboutsomething, including a 15-second chat with Janet from accounting about how freaking cold the A/C is inthe conference room. The good news is that you can just go ahead and repurpose your anxiety aboutmaking small talk with your co-workers and worry instead about not making small talk with yourco-workers. See? Easy switch.Because while small talk can be torture, the absence of it can also make us feel bad about ourselves, likewe’re true failures at life for not being able to connect with a fellow member of the herd, worried deepdown that we will be kicked out of society and left to rot alone on the plains, to pay for our ownstreaming services instead of sharing a login.Here are a few thoughts on how to avoid that feeling.Remember: You’re More Likable Than You ThinkA 2018 study published in Psychological Science showed that people “systematically underestimatedhow much their conversation partners liked them and enjoyed their company.”Think about it: when you have an awkward small talk interaction with a co-worker (it’s stunted, therewere silences, neither of you could think of something to say) do you normally go back to your desk andthink, “Wow, Alex is a terrible conversationalist”? No. You go back to your desk and think, “Wow, I’m arotten garbage human being who should be shunned from society.” And Alex is thinking the same thingabout him or herself . . .A Little Planning Goes a Long WayIf you’re generally anxious in social situations, i.e. human, Ms. Terran suggested coming up with corequestions or stories from which you can pull.“Whether or not you share personal information about yourself is up to you, but discussing things youtruly care about is always the best strategy,” she said. “Topics relating to your professional field, forexample, an article you saw or book you read, is a great place to start.”From The New York Times. © 2019 The New York Times Company. All rights reserved. Used under license.Source BSchwantes, Marcel. “Banning Small Talk From Your Conversations Makes You Happier, Says Science(Ask Any of These 12 Questions for a Change).” Inc., 12 Sept. 2018,www.inc.com/marcel-schwantes/banning-small-talk-from-your-conversations-makes-youhappier-says-science-ask-any-of-these-12-questions-for-a-change.html.The following is excerpted from an article written by a leadership professional.When you attend a networking event, cocktail party, or meet someone for a business lunch, exchangingsuperficial small talk is par for the course.Sure, questions like What do you do? and Where do you live? are almost necessary to get someconversational momentum. But how many of us are willing to go deeper? How many of us can saywe are adept at drawing someone into a meaningful conversation that may lead to mutual benefit?As science discovered, the exchange of the often-rare meaningful interaction in social or business settingscan be the difference between happiness and unhappiness.Kiss the small talk goodbye, says scienceAs published in Psychological Science, researchers found that the happiest participants in a studyinvolving more than 20,000 recorded conversations had twice as many genuine and deep talks as theunhappiest participants. This confirms what most people know: Surface-level small talk does not buildrelationships.Behavioral scientists Kristen Berman and Dan Ariely tested the theory by hosting a dinner party wheresmall talk was literally banned. To set some parameters for good conversations, they provided big indexcards with examples of meaningful conversation starters.Instead of decreasing freedom, “people appeared freer to talk about the things they really wanted to talkabout,” state the authors. In turn, “everyone was happier.”Entrepreneurs and leaders of every persuasion have seized on the opportunity to socially engage withcaptivating questions posed at “Jefferson”-style dinners across the country.Try Jeffersonian dinnersJennifer McCrea, senior research fellow at the Hauser Institute for Civil Society at the Kennedy Schoolat Harvard University, co-authored a book about Jeffersonian dinners called The Generosity Network.“We were kind of tired of traditional galas and standing cocktail parties where people were making smalltalk and then would get pitched to by an organization—and nothing would come out of them,” McCreaexplains. “The genesis is that Thomas Jefferson himself apparently would do dinners like this at his homeand bring in very important people.”Such events, whether attracting big wigs or neighbors, open up all kinds of possibilities for introverts.Barry Breaux, a Bay Area physician, hosts such gatherings with simple rules of engagement, including:● No small talk once discussion starts; no side conversations.● Confidentiality is a must—respect the privacy of personal stories and information that may beshared.● If you disagree with something, attack ideas, not people.Inc. is a registered trademark of Mansueto VenturesLLC.Source CLenhart, Amanda, et al. “Chapter Two: How Phones Are Used with Friends - What They Can Do andHow Teens Use Them.” Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Tech, 3 Jan. 2014,what-they-can-do-and-how-teens-use-them/.www.pewinternet.org/2010/04/20/chapter-two-how-phones-are-used-with-friendsThe following graph is adapted from a Pew Research Center study of teenagers’mobile-phone usage.Conducted in 2009, the study surveyed 625 mobile phone users, aged 12–17. Regarding the resultspresented in the graph, the researchers note a margin of error of +/- 5%.Source DHolmes, Janet. “Doing Collegiality and Keeping Control at Work: Small Talk in GovernmentDepartments.” Small Talk, edited by Justine Coupland, Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group, 2000, pp.32-61.The following is excerpted from a book of essays with varying perspectives on small talk with thesupport of analyses of interactional data in specific social settings.Paying attention to the face needs of others is a crucial component of ‘doing friendship’ (see Holmes1995, Coates 1996). In the workplace, the equivalent activity can perhaps be described as ‘doingcollegiality’. . . .‘Doing collegiality’ involves, in particular, paying attention to the positive face needs of participants, andsmall talk is an obvious example of discourse which is oriented to the addressee’s positive face needs.Indeed, small talk might be considered a core example of positively polite talk. Like complimentingbehaviour, it is designed to signal that the addressee’s wants, ‘or the actions/acquisitions/values resultingfrom them’ (Brown and Levinson 1987: 101) are appreciated and shared by the speaker. Small talktypically serves to establish, maintain or renew social relationships (Laver 1975, 1981). In the workplacethe exchange of greetings, complaints about how busy life is, promises to get in touch for lunch, coffeeand so on, are examples of small talk tokens that serve this positive politeness function.Extract 16Context: Joan and Elizabeth pass in the corridor1 E: hi Joan2 J: hi how are you3 E: oh busy busy busy4 J: mm terrible isn’t itExtract 17Context: Jon and May pass on the stairs1 J: hello hello/haven’t seen you for a while2 M: /hi3 [M:] well I’ve been a bit busy4 J: must have lunch sometime5 M: yea good idea give me a ringln these extracts, small talk enables these workmates to ‘do collegiality’. They indicate mutual goodintentions as they construct, maintain, repair or extend their collegial relationships. Jon’s use of‘sometime’ in his invitation is an indication of the largely symbolic status of the interchange, and this isratified by May’s equally nonspecific suggestion that he ring her; no precise time or date is mentioned (cf.Wolfson et al. 1983 on invitations). Reference to how busy one is serves in the workplace as an idealsmall talk token. lt indicates an orientation to the ‘proper’ goals of the workplace, while also providing anacceptable account of why social relationships receive less attention than might be expected of goodcolleagues: in other words ‘busyness’ is an acceptable excuse for perfunctory attention to interpersonalrelationships at work.As mentioned above, positively polite small talk can also serve a valuable bridging function, a means oftransition to the main business of a workplace interaction. Small talk warms people up socially, oils theinterpersonal wheels and gets talk started on a positive note. . . . Talk about holidays and leisure activitiesprovide a gentle introduction to work talk. In these extracts, small talk serves what Laver calls aninitiatory function of ‘getting the interaction comfortably underway’ (1975: 221; see also Tannen 1994:65).’Reproduced from Small Talk, 1st Edition by Justine, Coupland, published by Routledge. © 2000, Taylor & Francis, ’Reproduced by permissionof Taylor & Francis Books UK.’Source ERoberts, David. “Why Small Talk Is so Excruciating.” Vox, 28 Oct. 2017, www.vox.com/2015/7/7/8903123/small-talk.The following is excerpted from an article published by a digital media company.I hate small talk. Hate it.And when I say I hate it, what I really mean is I’m abysmal at it. Just a total failure.Here’s how I experience small talk. Say I find myself interacting with a sales clerk, meeting someone at aparty or conference, bumping into a neighbor on the street, any situation that calls for chitchat. Theminute the interaction begins, something inside me—I’d call it a “thought,” but it’s deeper than that,physical almost—wants to get out of it. My fight-or-flight instincts kick in. It’s like the somatic equivalentof white noise, louder and louder the longer the interaction goes on. It doesn’t take long before it’sdeafening and I break it off, often in less-than-smooth ways.The weird thing is, it’s not that I have some general aversion to talking to people. I love talking to people!. . . And I don’t have generalized social anxiety. I’m perfectly comfortable in a group situation, orspeaking before a crowd, both of which terrify many people. It’s not people in general, or social situationsin general, but specifically one-on-one small talk that is the issue.The problem, of course, is that small talk precedes big talk in the normal course of human affairs. Mostpeople feel the need to get comfortable with one another before they jump into the deep end of seriousconversation or ongoing friendship. Which means if you hate and avoid small talk, you are also, as apractical matter, cutting yourself off from lots of meaningful social interaction, which is a bummer. Also,research shows that more frequent small talk, even among those who identify as introverts, makes peoplehappier. Also, despite recent advances in technology, small talk remains an unavoidable part of manybasic life tasks.So it would be nice to be better at small talk, or at least to understand why I’m so horrible at it. Let’stake a quick look at the research.Researchers realize that small talk is no small thingFor all its ubiquity, small talk hasn’t come in for a ton of academic study. The first theoretical account isgenerally traced to anthropologist Bronisław Malinowski, in his 1923 essay “The Problem of Meaning inPrimitive Languages.” He noted that a great deal of talk “does not serve any purpose of communicatingideas” but instead “serves to establish bonds of personal union.” Malinowski termed the exchange ofsuch talk “phatic communion” (“phatic” from the Greek phatos, for “spoken”). It is speech as socialbonding rather than communication.Vox.com, writer David Roberts, and Vox Media, Inc. Oct 28, 2017Source FWarren, Sofia. Small Talk Vortex. 2017. Fine Art America, fineartamerica.com/featured/small-talk-vortex-sofia-warren.html.The following is a cartoon that appeared in the New Yorker magazine in 2017.Sofia Warren/The New Yorker Collection/The Cartoon Bank

question:Delilah is a rich 19-year-old drama student. She has pale skin, blue eyes, and long chestnut hair. She's wearing a nice outfit with lots of layers which you should come up with.From Delilah's perspective, write a scene in first person where she’s just lost a TV quiz show, and her punishment is to be made into a human trifle. A deluge of food cascades from above, and absolutely saturates her in a rainbow of sticky desserts and sweet toppings, both thick and runny, chunky and smooth. Her hair and face are smothered; every item of her clothing is oozing with goop inside and out, all the pockets overflowing, waterfalls of it pouring onto the floor.Use specific language. Pace the scene slowly to keep up tension. Include lots of dialogue. Make it long. Be specific about how the mess covers Delilah.

question:Imagine a fighter, who is a combination of the following characters, their personalities and skills:Jessica Rabbit, Xenia Onatopp, Santanico Pandmonium, Catwoman, Tina CarlyleWhat would be a great submission move for her? Explain in detail how you come tot hat conclusion.

question:Please write a vividly detailed and comedic fictional story set in the Hearts of Iron mod’s world of Kaiserreich after Germany has recently won the second Weltkrieg, about a German politcian’s boyfriends who are Lithuanian, Ukrainian, and Polish twinks currently relaxing on their bed and snacking au naturel as they happily chat with each other as the politician tops one of them.

question:Придумай 2 реалистичных положительных seo отзыва от покупателя владельца магазина для этого товара: https://majorcake.ru/rulety/rulet-tiramisu