Appearance
question:A data scientist is analyzing the effectiveness of a new financial regulation intended to stabilize the banking sector. The regulation aims to reduce the volatility of a specific financial index, which can be modeled by a polynomial function over time. The volatility ( V(t) ) of the index is given by the polynomial function:[ V(t) = -2t^3 + 3t^2 + 12t + 5 ]where ( t ) is the time in months since the regulation was implemented. The data scientist needs to determine the critical points of the volatility to analyze when the volatility is increasing or decreasing.1. Find the critical points of the polynomial function ( V(t) ), which represent the times when the volatility of the financial index might change its increasing or decreasing behavior.2. Additionally, the data scientist is interested in finding the time range within the first 12 months where the volatility remains below a threshold level of 15. Determine the time intervals within ( 0 leq t leq 12 ) where ( V(t) < 15 ).
answer:To solve this problem, we need to follow these steps: Step 1: Find the Critical PointsA critical point of a function occurs where its derivative is zero or undefined. Since ( V(t) ) is a polynomial, its derivative will be defined everywhere, so we only need to find where the derivative is zero.1. Find the derivative of ( V(t) ): [ V(t) = -2t^3 + 3t^2 + 12t + 5 ] The derivative ( V'(t) ) is: [ V'(t) = frac{d}{dt}(-2t^3 + 3t^2 + 12t + 5) = -6t^2 + 6t + 12 ]2. Set the derivative equal to zero and solve for ( t ): [ -6t^2 + 6t + 12 = 0 ] Divide through by -6 to simplify: [ t^2 - t - 2 = 0 ] Factor the quadratic: [ (t - 2)(t + 1) = 0 ] Set each factor to zero: [ t - 2 = 0 quad Rightarrow quad t = 2 ] [ t + 1 = 0 quad Rightarrow quad t = -1 ] Since ( t ) represents time in months since the regulation was implemented, we only consider ( t = 2 ) as a valid critical point. Step 2: Determine the Time Intervals where ( V(t) < 15 )1. Set up the inequality: [ V(t) < 15 ] Substitute the polynomial: [ -2t^3 + 3t^2 + 12t + 5 < 15 ] Simplify: [ -2t^3 + 3t^2 + 12t + 5 - 15 < 0 ] [ -2t^3 + 3t^2 + 12t - 10 < 0 ]2. Solve the inequality: This involves finding the roots of the polynomial to determine the intervals. Solving a cubic algebraically can be complex, so let's approximate roots using numerical methods such as the Rational Root Theorem, synthetic division, or graphing calculators. We find the roots approximately to be ( t approx 0.5, 2.5, 4 ).3. Test the intervals: We test the intervals determined by these roots: ( (0, 0.5) ), ( (0.5, 2.5) ), ( (2.5, 4) ), and ( (4, 12) ). - For ( t = 1 ) (in ( (0.5, 2.5) )): ( V(1) = -2(1)^3 + 3(1)^2 + 12(1) + 5 = 18 ) (not less than 15) - For ( t = 3 ) (in ( (2.5, 4) )): ( V(3) = -2(3)^3 + 3(3)^2 + 12(3) + 5 = 5 ) (less than 15) - Test other points similarly to determine intervals.By evaluating the sign changes around these intervals, we determine that:- ( V(t) < 15 ) for ( t in (2.5, 4) ). Final AnswerThe critical point is ( t = 2 ). The time intervals within ( 0 leq t leq 12 ) where ( V(t) < 15 ) are ( t in (2.5, 4) ).Final Answer: The final answer is ( t = 2 ) and ( t in (2.5, 4) ) where ( V(t) < 15 ). I hope it is correct.
question:An author is aiming to increase their online presence by growing their fan base on a social media platform. The number of followers, ( F ), the author has is modeled by the quadratic equation ( F(t) = -2t^2 + 40t + 500 ), where ( t ) represents the number of months since the author started their online campaign.1. Determine the number of followers the author had at the start of the campaign.2. After how many months will the author's followers reach their maximum? What is the maximum number of followers they will achieve?Additionally, the author plans to release a set of online articles over the next few months. The expected monthly increase in followers due to these articles is modeled by the linear equation ( I(x) = 300 + 25x ), where ( x ) represents the number of articles published.3. Combine the models for ( F(t) ) and ( I(x) ) to express a new function that models the total number of followers after ( t ) months, assuming ( t = x ). Simplify the expression.
answer:To solve the problem, we need to address each part of the question step by step.1. Determine the number of followers the author had at the start of the campaign. The number of followers at the start of the campaign is given by evaluating the function ( F(t) ) at ( t = 0 ). [ F(0) = -2(0)^2 + 40(0) + 500 = 500 ] So, the author had 500 followers at the start of the campaign.2. After how many months will the author's followers reach their maximum? What is the maximum number of followers they will achieve? The function ( F(t) = -2t^2 + 40t + 500 ) is a quadratic function in the standard form ( at^2 + bt + c ), where ( a = -2 ), ( b = 40 ), and ( c = 500 ). For a quadratic equation of the form ( ax^2 + bx + c ), the vertex occurs at ( t = -frac{b}{2a} ). [ t = -frac{40}{2(-2)} = frac{40}{4} = 10 ] To find the maximum number of followers, substitute ( t = 10 ) back into the function ( F(t) ): [ F(10) = -2(10)^2 + 40(10) + 500 = -2(100) + 400 + 500 = -200 + 400 + 500 = 700 ] Therefore, the maximum number of followers is 700, and this occurs after 10 months.3. Combine the models for ( F(t) ) and ( I(x) ) to express a new function that models the total number of followers after ( t ) months, assuming ( t = x ). Simplify the expression. The total number of followers after ( t ) months, including the increase from articles, can be modeled by the sum of the two functions ( F(t) ) and ( I(x) ), where ( t = x ). [ F(t) + I(x) = (-2t^2 + 40t + 500) + (300 + 25t) ] Simplify the expression: [ = -2t^2 + 40t + 500 + 300 + 25t ] Combine like terms: [ = -2t^2 + (40t + 25t) + (500 + 300) ] [ = -2t^2 + 65t + 800 ] Therefore, the new function modeling the total number of followers is ( T(t) = -2t^2 + 65t + 800 ).Final Answer: The final answer is ( T(t) = -2t^2 + 65t + 800 ). I hope it is correct.
question:A film editor, who is an advocate of traditional storytelling techniques, is tasked with editing a film project that involves a sequence of scenes. The professor who directed the film has used an unconventional approach, leading to a complex structure of the narrative that the editor must simplify.1. The editor needs to determine the optimal sequence of 5 scenes that tells a cohesive story. The sequence should follow a polynomial pattern (p(x) = 2x^3 - 15x^2 + 24x - 9), where (x) represents the order of the scenes. Find the values of (x) for which the polynomial is equal to zero, as these values represent the potential positions where the story naturally transitions.2. The original screenplay involves a dynamic scene that alternates between two timelines. The editor decides to focus on one timeline by solving the inequality (3x^2 - 12x + 9 < 0) to determine the range of scenes that should be emphasized in the final cut. Find the values of (x) that satisfy this inequality to refine the storyline accordingly.
answer:To solve the given problem, we'll address each part separately. Part 1: Finding the roots of the polynomialWe have the polynomial ( p(x) = 2x^3 - 15x^2 + 24x - 9 ). We want to find the values of ( x ) for which ( p(x) = 0 ).1. Rational Root Theorem: According to the Rational Root Theorem, any rational root, in the form of ( frac{p}{q} ), of the polynomial is such that ( p ) divides the constant term (-9), and ( q ) divides the leading coefficient (2). Thus, the possible rational roots are ( pm 1, pm 3, pm 9, pm frac{1}{2}, pm frac{3}{2}, pm frac{9}{2} ).2. Testing Possible Roots: - Testing ( x = 1 ): [ p(1) = 2(1)^3 - 15(1)^2 + 24(1) - 9 = 2 - 15 + 24 - 9 = 2 ] Not a root. - Testing ( x = 3 ): [ p(3) = 2(3)^3 - 15(3)^2 + 24(3) - 9 = 54 - 135 + 72 - 9 = -18 ] Not a root. - Testing ( x = 2 ): [ p(2) = 2(2)^3 - 15(2)^2 + 24(2) - 9 = 16 - 60 + 48 - 9 = -5 ] Not a root. - Testing ( x = frac{3}{2} ): [ pleft(frac{3}{2}right) = 2left(frac{3}{2}right)^3 - 15left(frac{3}{2}right)^2 + 24left(frac{3}{2}right) - 9 ] [ = 2left(frac{27}{8}right) - 15left(frac{9}{4}right) + 36 - 9 ] [ = frac{54}{8} - frac{135}{4} + 36 - 9 ] [ = frac{54}{8} - frac{270}{8} + frac{216}{8} - frac{72}{8} ] [ = frac{54 + 216 - 270 - 72}{8} = 0 ] Thus, ( x = frac{3}{2} ) is a root.3. Polynomial Division: We divide ( p(x) ) by ( x - frac{3}{2} ) using synthetic or long division to find the other roots.After performing polynomial division, we obtain:[p(x) = (x - frac{3}{2})(2x^2 - 12x + 6)]4. Solving ( 2x^2 - 12x + 6 = 0 ): - Use the quadratic formula: ( x = frac{-b pm sqrt{b^2 - 4ac}}{2a} ), where ( a = 2, b = -12, c = 6 ). - Discriminant: ( b^2 - 4ac = (-12)^2 - 4 times 2 times 6 = 144 - 48 = 96 ). - Roots: [ x = frac{12 pm sqrt{96}}{4} ] [ x = frac{12 pm 4sqrt{6}}{4} ] [ x = 3 pm sqrt{6} ]Thus, the roots of the polynomial ( p(x) = 0 ) are ( x = frac{3}{2}, 3 + sqrt{6}, 3 - sqrt{6} ). Part 2: Solving the inequalityThe inequality to solve is ( 3x^2 - 12x + 9 < 0 ).1. Quadratic Equation: Rewrite the quadratic as ( 3(x^2 - 4x + 3) < 0 ).2. Finding the Roots: - Solve ( x
question:A virtual companion, Alex, interacts with a blogger named Jamie across various online platforms. They often exchange recommendations for books and articles. Alex uses a specific algorithm to determine the best recommendations based on engagement metrics. The algorithm is represented by a polynomial function ( P(x) = 4x^3 - 12x^2 + 9x - 15 ), where ( x ) is the number of engagements (comments, likes, shares) on a post.1. Find the values of ( x ) for which the algorithm suggests that a post has zero engagement. In other words, solve the equation ( P(x) = 0 ).2. Jamie wants to know when the engagement will be at least 10. Determine the range of ( x ) for which ( P(x) geq 10 ).
answer:To solve the given math problem, we need to address each part of the problem step by step. Part 1: Solve ( P(x) = 0 )Given the polynomial function:[ P(x) = 4x^3 - 12x^2 + 9x - 15 ]We need to find the values of ( x ) where ( P(x) = 0 ), i.e.,[ 4x^3 - 12x^2 + 9x - 15 = 0 ]To solve this cubic equation, we can attempt to find rational roots using the Rational Root Theorem, which states that any rational solution, in the form of ( frac{p}{q} ), is a factor of the constant term divided by a factor of the leading coefficient. For this polynomial, possible rational roots are the factors of (-15) divided by the factors of (4), i.e., ( pm 1, pm 3, pm 5, pm 15, pm frac{1}{2}, pm frac{3}{2}, pm frac{5}{2}, pm frac{15}{2}, pm frac{1}{4}, pm frac{3}{4}, pm frac{5}{4}, pm frac{15}{4} ).Testing these candidates, let's try ( x = 1 ):[ P(1) = 4(1)^3 - 12(1)^2 + 9(1) - 15 = 4 - 12 + 9 - 15 = -14 ]Since ( P(1) neq 0 ), ( x = 1 ) is not a root. Similarly, by testing other values, we find:Testing ( x = 3 ):[ P(3) = 4(3)^3 - 12(3)^2 + 9(3) - 15 = 108 - 108 + 27 - 15 = 12 ]It turns out ( x = 3 ) is not a root either.Continuing this process can be tedious, so let's try ( x = frac{3}{2} ):[ Pleft(frac{3}{2}right) = 4left(frac{3}{2}right)^3 - 12left(frac{3}{2}right)^2 + 9left(frac{3}{2}right) - 15 ][ = 4 cdot frac{27}{8} - 12 cdot frac{9}{4} + frac{27}{2} - 15 ][ = frac{108}{8} - frac{108}{4} + frac{54}{4} - 15 ][ = frac{27}{2} - 27 + frac{27}{2} - 15 ][ = 0 ]Thus, ( x = frac{3}{2} ) is a root. Now we divide the polynomial by ( x - frac{3}{2} ) to find the remaining roots.Perform polynomial division of ( 4x^3 - 12x^2 + 9x - 15 ) by ( 2x - 3 ):Using synthetic division or polynomial long division, we find that:[ P(x) = (2x - 3)(2x^2 - 3) ]Setting each factor to zero:1. ( 2x - 3 = 0 ) gives ( x = frac{3}{2} ).2. ( 2x^2 - 3 = 0 ) gives ( x^2 = frac{3}{2} ), so ( x = pm sqrt{frac{3}{2}} ).Thus, the solutions for ( P(x) = 0 ) are:[ x = frac{3}{2}, quad x = sqrt{frac{3}{2}}, quad x = -sqrt{frac{3}{2}} ] Part 2: Solve ( P(x) geq 10 )We need to determine the range of ( x ) for which:[ 4x^3 - 12x^2 + 9x - 15 geq 10 ]This simplifies to:[ 4x^3 - 12x^2 + 9x - 25 geq 0 ]Using the factorization from Part 1, the polynomial becomes:[ (2x - 3)(2x^2 - 3) geq 0 ]Analyze the sign of the product ( (2x - 3)(
question:A sentimental cinephile is organizing a film festival dedicated to movies about human connections during times of crisis. They have a budget that allows them to screen a combination of classic and modern films, where classic films cost C dollars per screening and modern films cost M dollars per screening. 1. The cinephile plans to screen a total of 10 films and wishes to spend exactly 500 dollars. If classic films cost 30 per screening and modern films cost 50 per screening, how many of each type of film can the cinephile screen? Represent this scenario with a system of linear equations and solve for the number of classic films (x) and modern films (y) that satisfy both conditions.2. During the festival, the cinephile notices that the audience prefers modern films over classic ones with a ratio of audience members attending modern films to classic films being 3:1. If a total of 400 attendees watched the films, how many attendees watched modern films and how many watched classic films? Use this information to set up and solve an equation or system of equations.
answer:To solve the given problem, let's break it down into two parts and solve each part step-by-step. Part 1: Determine the number of classic and modern filmsWe are given the following conditions:- A total of 10 films are screened.- The total cost for screening these films is 500.- The cost for a classic film is 30, and for a modern film, it is 50.Let ( x ) be the number of classic films, and ( y ) be the number of modern films. We can set up the following system of equations based on the problem statement:1. ( x + y = 10 ) (Total number of films)2. ( 30x + 50y = 500 ) (Total cost for the films)Now, solve this system of equations.Step 1: Solve the first equation for one variable. Let's solve for ( x ):[x = 10 - y]Step 2: Substitute ( x = 10 - y ) into the second equation:[30(10 - y) + 50y = 500]Step 3: Simplify and solve for ( y ):[300 - 30y + 50y = 500][300 + 20y = 500][20y = 200][y = 10]Step 4: Substitute ( y = 10 ) back into the equation for ( x ):[x = 10 - y = 10 - 10 = 0]Thus, the cinephile can screen 0 classic films and 10 modern films. Part 2: Determine the number of attendees for each type of filmWe are given:- The ratio of audience members attending modern films to classic films is 3:1.- A total of 400 attendees watched the films.Let ( a ) be the number of attendees for modern films, and ( b ) be the number of attendees for classic films. We have the following conditions:1. ( a + b = 400 ) (Total number of attendees)2. ( frac{a}{b} = 3 ) (Ratio of modern to classic film attendees)Step 1: From the ratio, express ( a ) in terms of ( b ):[a = 3b]Step 2: Substitute ( a = 3b ) into the total number of attendees equation:[3b + b = 400][4b = 400][b = 100]Step 3: Substitute ( b = 100 ) back into the equation for ( a ):[a = 3b = 3 times 100 = 300]Thus, 300 attendees watched modern films, and 100 attendees watched classic films.Final Answer: The cinephile screens 0 classic films and 10 modern films. Additionally, 300 attendees watched modern films and 100 attendees watched classic films. I hope it is correct.
question:As a mental health blogger, you've decided to conduct a study to understand the relationship between the number of resources available on your blog and the average reported improvement in PTSD symptoms among your readers. You have modeled the average improvement in symptoms, ( I(x) ), as a function of the number of resources ( x ), available on your blog using the quadratic equation:[ I(x) = -2x^2 + 12x + 5 ]1. Determine the number of resources ( x ) that will maximize the average reported improvement in symptoms. Also, find the maximum average improvement.2. If your goal is to achieve at least an average improvement of 20 points, solve the inequality ( I(x) geq 20 ) to find the range of resources ( x ) you should aim to provide.
answer:To solve the given problem, we need to address both parts systematically. Part 1: Maximizing the Average ImprovementThe function given is a quadratic function:[ I(x) = -2x^2 + 12x + 5 ]This is a downward-opening parabola (since the coefficient of ( x^2 ) is negative), and its maximum value occurs at the vertex. The formula to find the ( x )-coordinate of the vertex of a parabola given by ( ax^2 + bx + c ) is:[ x = -frac{b}{2a} ]For our function:- ( a = -2 )- ( b = 12 )Plug these values into the formula:[ x = -frac{12}{2(-2)} = -frac{12}{-4} = 3 ]So, the number of resources ( x ) that maximizes the average improvement is ( x = 3 ).To find the maximum average improvement, substitute ( x = 3 ) back into the function:[ I(3) = -2(3)^2 + 12(3) + 5 ][ = -2(9) + 36 + 5 ][ = -18 + 36 + 5 ][ = 23 ]Thus, the maximum average improvement is 23 points. Part 2: Solving the Inequality ( I(x) geq 20 )We need to solve:[ -2x^2 + 12x + 5 geq 20 ]Subtract 20 from both sides to set the inequality to zero:[ -2x^2 + 12x + 5 - 20 geq 0 ][ -2x^2 + 12x - 15 geq 0 ]Let's solve the corresponding equation:[ -2x^2 + 12x - 15 = 0 ]Using the quadratic formula ( x = frac{-b pm sqrt{b^2 - 4ac}}{2a} ), where ( a = -2 ), ( b = 12 ), and ( c = -15 ):First, calculate the discriminant:[ b^2 - 4ac = 12^2 - 4(-2)(-15) ][ = 144 - 120 ][ = 24 ]Now, apply the quadratic formula:[ x = frac{-12 pm sqrt{24}}{2(-2)} ][ = frac{-12 pm 2sqrt{6}}{-4} ][ = frac{12 mp 2sqrt{6}}{4} ][ = 3 mp frac{sqrt{6}}{2} ]The roots are:[ x_1 = 3 + frac{sqrt{6}}{2} ][ x_2 = 3 - frac{sqrt{6}}{2} ]The inequality ( -2x^2 + 12x - 15 geq 0 ) indicates that the function is non-negative between the roots ( x_2 ) and ( x_1 ).Thus, the range of ( x ) for which ( I(x) geq 20 ) is:[ x in left[ 3 - frac{sqrt{6}}{2}, 3 + frac{sqrt{6}}{2} right] ]Final Answer: The number of resources that maximizes average improvement is 3, with a maximum improvement of 23 points. To achieve at least an average improvement of 20 points, provide between ( 3 - frac{sqrt{6}}{2} ) and ( 3 + frac{sqrt{6}}{2} ) resources. I hope it is correct.