Appearance
question:As a loyal supporter of the monarchy, you are tasked with crafting a unique crown for the king, which symbolizes stability and tradition. The crown is to be designed with a series of arches, each in the shape of a parabolic curve. The height ( h(x) ) in centimeters of each arch above the base of the crown is modeled by the quadratic equation ( h(x) = -2x^2 + 12x ), where ( x ) is the horizontal distance in centimeters from the leftmost point of the arch.1. Determine the width of each arch by finding the values of ( x ) where the height ( h(x) ) is zero.2. To ensure the crown maintains its grandeur, the maximum height of the arch should be at least 18 centimeters. Calculate whether the current design meets this requirement by finding the vertex of the parabola. If it does not meet the requirement, suggest a necessary adjustment to the equation.
answer:To solve the problem, we need to address both parts of the question.1. Determine the width of each arch by finding the values of ( x ) where the height ( h(x) ) is zero. The height ( h(x) ) is given by the quadratic equation: [ h(x) = -2x^2 + 12x ] To find the values of ( x ) where ( h(x) = 0 ), we solve the equation: [ -2x^2 + 12x = 0 ] Factor out the common term: [ -2x(x - 6) = 0 ] Set each factor equal to zero: [ -2x = 0 quad text{or} quad x - 6 = 0 ] Solving these gives: [ x = 0 quad text{and} quad x = 6 ] The width of each arch is the distance between these two points, which is: [ 6 - 0 = 6 text{ centimeters} ]2. Calculate whether the current design meets the requirement of a maximum height of at least 18 centimeters by finding the vertex of the parabola. The vertex of a parabola given by ( ax^2 + bx + c ) is at ( x = -frac{b}{2a} ). For our equation ( h(x) = -2x^2 + 12x ), the coefficients are ( a = -2 ) and ( b = 12 ). The vertex ( x ) coordinate is: [ x = -frac{12}{2(-2)} = frac{12}{4} = 3 ] Substitute ( x = 3 ) back into the height equation to find the maximum height: [ h(3) = -2(3)^2 + 12(3) = -2(9) + 36 = -18 + 36 = 18 ] The maximum height of the arch is 18 centimeters, which meets the requirement.Final Answer: The width of each arch is 6 centimeters, and the maximum height is 18 centimeters, which meets the requirement. I hope it is correct.
question:A soil scientist is studying the productivity of grazing lands and has found that the productivity ( P(x) ) of a particular patch of land, measured in units of biomass per acre, can be modeled by the quadratic equation ( P(x) = -5x^2 + 30x + 100 ), where ( x ) represents the amount of a specific nutrient added to the soil, in kilograms per acre.1. Determine the optimal amount of nutrient, ( x ), that should be added to maximize the productivity of the grazing land. What is the maximum productivity achieved at this optimal nutrient level?2. The soil scientist also needs to ensure that the productivity remains above 150 units of biomass per acre to maintain the sustainability of the land. For what range of nutrient amounts ( x ) is the productivity above 150 units?
answer:To solve the problem, we will address both parts step-by-step. Part 1: Optimal Amount of Nutrient to Maximize ProductivityThe productivity function given is:[ P(x) = -5x^2 + 30x + 100. ]This is a quadratic function in the standard form ( ax^2 + bx + c ), where ( a = -5 ), ( b = 30 ), and ( c = 100 ). Since ( a < 0 ), the parabola opens downwards, and the vertex represents the maximum point.The vertex of a quadratic function ( ax^2 + bx + c ) is given by the formula:[ x = -frac{b}{2a}. ]Substitute the values of ( a ) and ( b ):[ x = -frac{30}{2(-5)} = frac{30}{10} = 3. ]Thus, the optimal amount of nutrient to maximize productivity is ( x = 3 ) kilograms per acre.Now, calculate the maximum productivity by substituting ( x = 3 ) back into the productivity function:[ P(3) = -5(3)^2 + 30(3) + 100. ][ P(3) = -5(9) + 90 + 100. ][ P(3) = -45 + 90 + 100. ][ P(3) = 145. ]The maximum productivity achieved is 145 units of biomass per acre. Part 2: Range of Nutrient Amounts for Productivity Above 150 UnitsWe need to find the range of ( x ) where ( P(x) > 150 ).Set up the inequality:[ -5x^2 + 30x + 100 > 150. ]Subtract 150 from both sides:[ -5x^2 + 30x + 100 - 150 > 0. ][ -5x^2 + 30x - 50 > 0. ]Divide the entire inequality by (-5) (note that this reverses the inequality sign):[ x^2 - 6x + 10 < 0. ]Now, solve the quadratic equation ( x^2 - 6x + 10 = 0 ) to find the boundary points. Use the quadratic formula:[ x = frac{-b pm sqrt{b^2 - 4ac}}{2a}, ]where ( a = 1 ), ( b = -6 ), ( c = 10 ).Calculate the discriminant:[ b^2 - 4ac = (-6)^2 - 4(1)(10) = 36 - 40 = -4. ]Since the discriminant is negative, there are no real roots, meaning the quadratic ( x^2 - 6x + 10 ) does not cross the x-axis and is always positive (since the parabola opens upwards).Thus, the quadratic ( x^2 - 6x + 10 < 0 ) has no real solutions, and ( P(x) > 150 ) cannot be satisfied for any value of ( x ). Therefore, productivity cannot be maintained above 150 units with the current function.Final Answer: The optimal amount of nutrient to maximize productivity is ( x = 3 ) kg/acre, achieving a maximum productivity of 145 units of biomass per acre. Unfortunately, productivity cannot be sustained above 150 units with this model. I hope it is correct.
question:As a geographer and history enthusiast from Pakistan, you are analyzing the population growth of a historical city over a certain period. Suppose the population of this city ( P(t) ), in thousands, can be modeled by a quadratic function:[ P(t) = -t^2 + 10t + 50 ]where ( t ) is the number of years since 2000.1. Determine the year in which the population of the city was at its maximum since 2000, and calculate the maximum population.2. In a particular historical year, the population of the city was recorded to be exactly 80,000. Find the year(s) in which this happened, assuming no other factors affected the population.
answer:To solve this problem, we will address each part individually.1. Determine the year in which the population was at its maximum and calculate the maximum population.The population function is given by:[ P(t) = -t^2 + 10t + 50. ]This is a quadratic function of the form ( P(t) = at^2 + bt + c ), where ( a = -1 ), ( b = 10 ), and ( c = 50 ). The vertex of a parabola described by a quadratic function ( ax^2 + bx + c ) occurs at ( t = -frac{b}{2a} ).Plugging in the values of ( a ) and ( b ):[t = -frac{10}{2 times (-1)} = frac{10}{2} = 5.]This means the population was at its maximum 5 years after 2000, which is the year 2005.Now, let's calculate the maximum population by substituting ( t = 5 ) back into the population function:[P(5) = -(5)^2 + 10 times 5 + 50 = -25 + 50 + 50 = 75.]Thus, the maximum population is 75,000 (since the units are in thousands).2. Find the year(s) when the population was exactly 80,000.We set the population function equal to 80:[-t^2 + 10t + 50 = 80.]Rearrange the equation:[-t^2 + 10t + 50 - 80 = 0 quad Rightarrow quad -t^2 + 10t - 30 = 0.]To simplify, multiply the entire equation by -1:[t^2 - 10t + 30 = 0.]Now, solve this quadratic equation using the quadratic formula:[t = frac{-b pm sqrt{b^2 - 4ac}}{2a},]where ( a = 1 ), ( b = -10 ), and ( c = 30 ).First, calculate the discriminant:[b^2 - 4ac = (-10)^2 - 4 times 1 times 30 = 100 - 120 = -20.]Since the discriminant is negative, there are no real solutions. This implies that the population never reached exactly 80,000.Final Answer: The final answer is the maximum population was 75,000 in the year 2005, and the population was never exactly 80,000. I hope it is correct.
question:A fitness trainer is helping a client transition to a plant-based diet and wants to ensure they receive adequate protein. The client needs at least 60 grams of protein per day. The trainer suggests incorporating two types of plant-based protein sources:1. Lentils, which provide 9 grams of protein per serving.2. Tofu, which provides 8 grams of protein per serving.The trainer recommends a combination of these sources such that the total cost does not exceed 5 per day, with lentils costing 0.60 per serving and tofu costing 0.80 per serving.1. Write a system of inequalities to represent the client's protein intake and budget constraints. Use ( x ) to represent the number of servings of lentils and ( y ) to represent the number of servings of tofu.2. Determine a combination of servings ( (x, y) ) that satisfies both the protein and budget constraints while minimizing the total number of servings.
answer:To solve this problem, we need to set up a system of inequalities based on the given constraints and then find a combination of servings that satisfies these constraints while minimizing the total number of servings. Step 1: Set up the inequalities1. Protein Requirement Inequality: - Each serving of lentils provides 9 grams of protein, and each serving of tofu provides 8 grams of protein. - The client needs at least 60 grams of protein per day. - Therefore, the inequality representing the protein requirement is: [ 9x + 8y geq 60 ]2. Budget Constraint Inequality: - Each serving of lentils costs 0.60, and each serving of tofu costs 0.80. - The total cost should not exceed 5. - Therefore, the inequality representing the budget constraint is: [ 0.60x + 0.80y leq 5 ]3. Non-negativity Constraints: - Since the number of servings cannot be negative: [ x geq 0, quad y geq 0 ] Step 2: Solve the system of inequalitiesWe need to find integer values of ( x ) and ( y ) that satisfy both inequalities and minimize ( x + y ).Intersection of the inequalities:1. Simplify the budget inequality: [ 0.60x + 0.80y leq 5 quad Rightarrow quad 3x + 4y leq 25 ]2. Graph the inequalities: - Protein Inequality: ( 9x + 8y geq 60 ) - Budget Inequality: ( 3x + 4y leq 25 ) We'll look for integer solutions that fall within the feasible region defined by these inequalities.Look for integer solutions:We start by examining integer solutions starting from small values of ( x ) and calculating corresponding ( y ).1. Try ( x = 4 ): - From the budget inequality: ( 3(4) + 4y leq 25 Rightarrow 12 + 4y leq 25 Rightarrow 4y leq 13 Rightarrow y leq 3.25 ) - So ( y leq 3 ). - Check for protein constraint with ( y = 3 ): [ 9(4) + 8(3) = 36 + 24 = 60 quad (text{exactly satisfies the protein requirement}) ]2. Verify if this minimizes ( x + y ): - Solution: ( (x, y) = (4, 3) ) - Total servings: ( x + y = 4 + 3 = 7 )This combination satisfies both constraints and has a total of 7 servings, which is minimal given the constraints.Final Answer: The final answer is ((x, y) = (4, 3)). I hope it is correct.
question:A proud and hopeful mother in Traverse City, Michigan, is planning a small garden in her backyard. She wants to plant flowers and vegetables in two separate rectangular plots. The total area for both plots is 120 square feet. The flower plot is twice as wide as it is long, and the vegetable plot is 4 feet longer than it is wide. 1. If the width of the vegetable plot is denoted by ( x ) feet, express the area of each plot in terms of ( x ), and write an equation representing the total area of both plots combined.2. Solve the equation from part 1 to find the dimensions of both the flower and vegetable plots.
answer:To solve the problem, let's go through it step-by-step.1. Express the area of each plot in terms of ( x ): - Vegetable Plot: - Let ( x ) be the width of the vegetable plot. - The length of the vegetable plot is 4 feet longer than its width, so the length is ( x + 4 ). - The area of the vegetable plot is given by: [ text{Area of Vegetable Plot} = x(x + 4) = x^2 + 4x ] - Flower Plot: - The flower plot is twice as wide as it is long. Let ( l ) be the length of the flower plot. Then, the width is ( 2l ). - The area of the flower plot is: [ text{Area of Flower Plot} = l times 2l = 2l^2 ]2. Write an equation representing the total area of both plots combined: The total area of both plots is 120 square feet, thus: [ x^2 + 4x + 2l^2 = 120 ]3. Relate the length of the flower plot to the vegetable plot width: We need another relationship to solve for both variables. Suppose the width of the vegetable plot ( x ) is twice the length of the flower plot ( l ) (since there's no direct relationship given, we assume a simple dependency): [ x = 2l ]4. Substitute ( x = 2l ) into the total area equation: Substituting ( x = 2l ) into the total area equation gives: [ (2l)^2 + 4(2l) + 2l^2 = 120 ] Simplifying: [ 4l^2 + 8l + 2l^2 = 120 ] [ 6l^2 + 8l = 120 ]5. Solve for ( l ): Divide the entire equation by 2: [ 3l^2 + 4l = 60 ] Rearrange to standard quadratic form: [ 3l^2 + 4l - 60 = 0 ] Use the quadratic formula to solve for ( l ): [ l = frac{-b pm sqrt{b^2 - 4ac}}{2a} ] where ( a = 3 ), ( b = 4 ), and ( c = -60 ). [ l = frac{-4 pm sqrt{4^2 - 4 times 3 times (-60)}}{2 times 3} ] [ l = frac{-4 pm sqrt{16 + 720}}{6} ] [ l = frac{-4 pm sqrt{736}}{6} ] [ l = frac{-4 pm 27.13}{6} ] Calculate the two possible values for ( l ): - ( l approx frac{23.13}{6} approx 3.855 ) - ( l approx frac{-31.13}{6} approx -5.188 ) (not feasible since length cannot be negative)6. Calculate ( x ) using the feasible ( l ): Substitute ( l approx 3.855 ) back to find ( x ): [ x = 2l approx 2 times 3.855 = 7.71 ]7. Dimensions of the plots: - Flower Plot: Length is approximately ( 3.855 ) feet, Width is approximately ( 7.71 ) feet. - Vegetable Plot: Width is approximately ( 7.71 ) feet, Length is approximately ( 11.71 ) feet (since ( x + 4 = 7.71 + 4 )).Final Answer: The final answer is Flower Plot (3.855 times 7.71), Vegetable Plot (7.71 times 11.71). I hope it is correct.
question:Inspired by her ancestors' achievements, Sarah decides to embark on a journey to fund her dream project. To do this, she plans to save money through an investment in a fund that compounds annually. She learns that one of her ancestors invested in a similar way, and their investment followed a polynomial growth model. Sarah wants to follow this model and projects her investment using a polynomial equation.1. Sarah invests 10,000 in a fund that grows according to the polynomial equation ( P(t) = 2t^3 + 3t^2 + 5t + 10000 ), where ( P(t) ) is the amount of money in the fund after ( t ) years. Determine after how many years, ( t ), her investment will first exceed 20,000.2. Additionally, Sarah recalls a tale where her ancestor's wealth was divided among their children according to the inequality ( 4n + 3 > 2n + 15 ), where ( n ) represents the number of children. Solve this inequality to find the possible number of children her ancestor had.
answer:To solve the given math problem, we need to address each part separately.1. Determine after how many years, ( t ), Sarah's investment will first exceed 20,000. We are given the polynomial equation for the investment: [ P(t) = 2t^3 + 3t^2 + 5t + 10000 ] We need to find the smallest integer ( t ) such that ( P(t) > 20000 ). Set up the inequality: [ 2t^3 + 3t^2 + 5t + 10000 > 20000 ] Simplify the inequality: [ 2t^3 + 3t^2 + 5t + 10000 - 20000 > 0 ] [ 2t^3 + 3t^2 + 5t - 10000 > 0 ] To find ( t ), we can test integer values starting from ( t = 0 ) upwards until the inequality holds true. - For ( t = 0 ): [ P(0) = 2(0)^3 + 3(0)^2 + 5(0) + 10000 = 10000 ] ( P(0) = 10000 not> 20000 ) - For ( t = 1 ): [ P(1) = 2(1)^3 + 3(1)^2 + 5(1) + 10000 = 2 + 3 + 5 + 10000 = 10010 ] ( P(1) = 10010 not> 20000 ) - For ( t = 2 ): [ P(2) = 2(2)^3 + 3(2)^2 + 5(2) + 10000 = 16 + 12 + 10 + 10000 = 10038 ] ( P(2) = 10038 not> 20000 ) - For ( t = 3 ): [ P(3) = 2(3)^3 + 3(3)^2 + 5(3) + 10000 = 54 + 27 + 15 + 10000 = 10096 ] ( P(3) = 10096 not> 20000 ) - For ( t = 4 ): [ P(4) = 2(4)^3 + 3(4)^2 + 5(4) + 10000 = 128 + 48 + 20 + 10000 = 10196 ] ( P(4) = 10196 not> 20000 ) - For ( t = 5 ): [ P(5) = 2(5)^3 + 3(5)^2 + 5(5) + 10000 = 250 + 75 + 25 + 10000 = 10350 ] ( P(5) = 10350 not> 20000 ) - For ( t = 6 ): [ P(6) = 2(6)^3 + 3(6)^2 + 5(6) + 10000 = 432 + 108 + 30 + 10000 = 10570 ] ( P(6) = 10570 not> 20000 ) - For ( t = 7 ): [ P(7) = 2(7)^3 + 3(7)^2 + 5(7) + 10000 = 686 + 147 + 35 + 10000 = 10868 ] ( P(7) = 10868 not> 20000 ) - For ( t = 8 ): [ P(8) = 2(8)^3 + 3(8)^2 + 5(8) + 10000 = 1024 + 192 + 40 + 10000 = 11356 ] ( P(8) = 11356 not> 20000 ) - For ( t = 9 ): [ P(9) = 2(9)^3 + 3(9)^2 + 5(9) + 10000 = 1458 + 243 + 45 + 10000 = 11746 ] (